按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
fter the lapse of centuries； the sub…breeds would become converted into two well…established and distinct breeds。 As the differences slowly become greater； the inferior animals with intermediate characters； being neither very swift nor very strong； will have been neglected； and will have tended to disappear。 Here； then； we see in man's productions the action of what may be called the principle of divergence； causing differences； at first barely appreciable； steadily to increase； and the breeds to diverge in character both from each other and from their common parent。
But how； it may be asked； can any analogous principle apply in nature？ I believe it can and does apply most efficiently； from the simple circumstance that the more diversified the descendants from any one species become in structure； constitution； and habits； by so much will they be better enabled to seize on many and widely diversified places in the polity of nature； and so be enabled to increase in numbers。
We can clearly see this in the case of animals with simple habits。 Take the case of a carnivorous quadruped； of which the number that can be supported in any country has long ago arrived at its full average。 If its natural powers of increase be allowed to act； it can succeed in increasing （the country not undergoing any change in its conditions） only by its varying descendants seizing on places at present occupied by other animals： some of them； for instance； being enabled to feed on new kinds of prey； either dead or alive； some inhabiting new stations； climbing trees； frequenting water； and some perhaps becoming less carnivorous。 The more diversified in habits and structure the descendants of our carnivorous animal became； the more places they would be enabled to occupy。 What applies to one animal will apply throughout all time to all animals that is； if they vary for otherwise natural selection can do nothing。 So it will be with plants。 It has been experimentally proved； that if a plot of ground be sown with several distinct genera of grasses； a greater number of plants and a greater weight of dry herbage can thus be raised。 The same has been found to hold good when first one variety and then several mixed varieties of wheat have been sown on equal spaces of ground。 Hence； if any one species of grass were to go on varying； and those varieties were continually selected which differed from each other in at all the same manner as distinct species and genera of grasses differ from each other； a greater number of individual plants of this species of grass； including its modified descendants； would succeed in living on the same piece of ground。 And we well know that each species and each variety of grass is annually sowing almost countless seeds； and thus； as it may be said； is striving its utmost to increase its numbers。 Consequently； I cannot doubt that in the course of many thousands of generations； the most distinct varieties of any one species of grass would always have the best chance of succeeding and of increasing in numbers； and thus of supplanting the less distinct varieties； and varieties； when rendered very distinct from each other； take the rank of species。
The truth of the principle； that the greatest amount of life can be supported by great diversification of structure； is seen under many natural circumstances。 In an extremely small area； especially if freely open to immigration； and where the contest between individual and individual must be severe； we always find great diversity in its inhabitants。 For instance； I found that a piece of turf； three feet by four in size； which had been exposed for many years to exactly the same conditions； supported twenty species of plants； and these belonged to eighteen genera and to eight orders； which shows how much these plants differed from each other。 So it is with the plants and insects on small and uniform islets； and so in small ponds of fresh water。 Farmers find that they can raise most food by a rotation of plants belonging to the most different orders： nature follows what may be called a simultaneous rotation。 Most of the animals and plants which live close round any small piece of ground； could live on it （supposing it not to be in any way peculiar in its nature）； and may be said to be striving to the utmost to live there； but； it is seen； that where they come into the closest competition with each other； the advantages of diversification of structure； with the accompanying differences of habit and constitution； determine that the inhabitants； which thus jostle each other most closely； shall； as a general rule； belong to what we call different genera and orders。
The same principle is seen in the naturalisation of plants through man's agency in foreign lands。 It might have been expected that the plants which have succeeded in becoming naturalised in any land would generally have been closely allied to the indigenes； for these are commonly looked at as specially created and adapted for their own country。 It might； also； perhaps have been expected that naturalised plants would have belonged to a few groups more especially adapted to certain stations in their new homes。 But the case is very different； and Alph。 De Candolle has well remarked in his great and admirable work； that floras gain by naturalisation； proportionally with the number of the native genera and species； far more in new genera than in new species。 To give a single instance： in the last edition of Dr Asa Gray's 'Manual of the Flora of the Northern United States；' 260 naturalised plants are enumerated； and these belong to 162 genera。 We thus see that these naturalised plants are of a highly diversified nature。 They differ； moreover； to a large extent from the indigenes； for out of the 162 genera； no less than 100 genera are not there indigenous； and thus a large proportional addition is made to the genera of these States。
By considering the nature of the plants or animals which have struggled successfully with the indigenes of any country； and have there become naturalised； we can gain some crude idea in what manner some of the natives would have had to be modified； in order to have gained an advantage over the other natives； and we may； I think； at least safely infer that diversification of structure； amounting to new generic differences； would have been profitable to them。
The advantage of diversification in the inhabitants of the same region is； in fact； the same as that of the physiological division of labour in the organs of the same individual body a subject so well elucidated by Milne Edwards。 No physiologist doubts that a stomach by being adapted to digest vegetable matter alone； or flesh alone； draws most nutriment from these substances。 So in the general economy of any land； the more widely and perfectly the animals and plants are diversified for different habits of life； so will a greater number of individuals be capable of there supporting themselves。 A set of animals； with their organisation but little diversified； could hardly compete with a set more perfectly diversified in structure。 It may be doubted； for instance； whether the Australian marsupials； which are divided into groups differing but little from each other