按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
tly Dr Hooker； even in stronger terms。 I shall reserve for my future work the discussion of these difficulties； and the tables themselves of the proportional numbers of the varying species。 Dr Hooker permits me to add； that after having carefully read my manuscript； and examined the tables； he thinks that the following statements are fairly well established。 The whole subject； however； treated as it necessarily here is with much brevity； is rather perplexing； and allusions cannot be avoided to the 'struggle for existence；' 'divergence of character；' and other questions； hereafter to be discussed。
Alph。 De Candolle and others have shown that plants which have very wide ranges generally present varieties； and this might have been expected； as they become exposed to diverse physical conditions； and as they come into competition （which； as we shall hereafter see； is a far more important circumstance） with different sets of organic beings。 But my tables further show that； in any limited country； the species which are most common； that is abound most in individuals； and the species which are most widely diffused within their own country （and this is a different consideration from wide range； and to a certain extent from commonness）； often give rise to varieties sufficiently well…marked to have been recorded in botanical works。 Hence it is the most flourishing； or； as they may be called； the dominant species； those which range widely over the world； are the most diffused in their own country； and are the most numerous in individuals； which oftenest produce well…marked varieties； or； as I consider them； incipient species。 And this； perhaps； might have been anticipated； for； as varieties； in order to become in any degree permanent； necessarily have to struggle with the other inhabitants of the country； the species which are already dominant will be the most likely to yield offspring which； though in some slight degree modified； will still inherit those advantages that enabled their parents to become dominant over their compatriots。
If the plants inhabiting a country and described in any Flora be divided into two equal masses； all those in the larger genera being placed on one side； and all those in the smaller genera on the other side； a somewhat larger number of the very common and much diffused or dominant species will be found on the side of the larger genera。 This； again； might have been anticipated； for the mere fact of many species of the same genus inhabiting any country； shows that there is something in the organic or inorganic conditions of that country favourable to the genus； and； consequently； we might have expected to have found in the larger genera； or those including many species； a large proportional number of dominant species。 But so many causes tend to obscure this result； that I am surprised that my tables show even a small majority on the side of the larger genera。 I will here allude to only two causes of obscurity。 Fresh…water and salt…loving plants have generally very wide ranges and are much diffused； but this seems to be connected with the nature of the stations inhabited by them； and has little or no relation to the size of the genera to which the species belong。 Again； plants low in the scale of organisation are generally much more widely diffused than plants higher in the scale； and here again there is no close relation to the size of the genera。 The cause of lowly…organised plants ranging widely will be discussed in our chapter on geographical distribution。
From looking at species as only strongly…marked and well…defined varieties； I was led to anticipate that the species of the larger genera in each country would oftener present varieties； than the species of the smaller genera； for wherever many closely related species （i。e。 species of the same genus） have been formed； many varieties or incipient species ought； as a general rule； to be now forming。 Where many large trees grow； we expect to find saplings。 Where many species of a genus have been formed through variation； circumstances have been favourable for variation； and hence we might expect that the circumstances would generally be still favourable to variation。 On the other hand； if we look at each species as a special act of creation； there is no apparent reason why more varieties should occur in a group having many species； than in one having few。
To test the truth of this anticipation I have arranged the plants of twelve countries； and the coleopterous insects of two districts； into two nearly equal masses； the species of the larger genera on one side； and those of the smaller genera on the other side； and it has invariably proved to be the case that a larger proportion of the species on the side of the larger genera present varieties； than on the side of the smaller genera。 Moreover； the species of the large genera which present any varieties； invariably present a larger average number of varieties than do the species of the small genera。 Both these results follow when another division is made； and when all the smallest genera； with from only one to four species； are absolutely excluded from the tables。 These facts are of plain signification on the view that species are only strongly marked and permanent varieties； for whenever many species of the same genus have been formed； or where； if we may use the expression； the manufactory of species has been active； we ought generally to find the manufactory still in action； more especially as we have every reason to believe the process of manufacturing new species to be a slow one。 And this certainly is the case； if varieties be looked at as incipient species； for my tables clearly show as a general rule that； wherever many species of a genus have been formed； the species of that genus present a number of varieties； that is of incipient species； beyond the average。 It is not that all large genera are now varying much； and are thus increasing in the number of their species； or that no small genera are now varying and increasing； for if this had been so； it would have been fatal to my theory； inasmuch as geology plainly tells us that small genera have in the lapse of time often increased greatly in size； and that large genera have often come to their maxima； declined； and disappeared。 All that we want to show is； that where many species of a genus have been formed； on an average many are still forming； and this holds good。
There are other relations between the species of large genera and their recorded varieties which deserve notice。 We have seen that there is no infallible criterion by which to distinguish species and well…marked varieties； and in those cases in which intermediate links have not been found between doubtful forms； naturalists are compelled to come to a determination by the amount of difference between them； judging by analogy whether or not the amount suffices to raise one or both to the rank of species。 Hence the amount of difference is one very important criterion in settling whether two forms should be ranked as species or varieties。 Now Fries has remarked in regard to plants； and Westwood in regard to insects； that in large genera the amount of difference between the species is of