按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
its civilization； its achievements； and its fortunes with the whole life of the modern world； can afford to ignore both its advocates and its accusers。 It lives on with or without the approval of theorists。
Accordingly； what here follows is no judgement； but rather a string of marginal notes； suggested by a study of the Italian Renaissance extending over some years。 The value to be attached to them is all the more qualified as they mostly touch on the life of the upper classes； with respect to which we are far better informed in Italy than in any other country in Europe at that period。 But though both fame and infamy sound louder here than elsewhere； we are not helped thereby in forming an adequate moral estimate of the people。
What eye can pierce the depths in which the character and fate of nations are determined？in which that which is inborn and that which has been experienced combine to form a new whole and a fresh nature？ in which even those intellectual capacities which at first sight we should take to be most original are in fact evolved late and slowly？ Who can tell if the Italian before the thirteenth century possessed that flexible activity and certainty in his whole beingthat play of power in shaping whatever subject he dealt with in word or in form； which was peculiar to him later？ And if no answer can be found to these questions； how can we possibly judge of the infinite and infinitely intricate channels through which character and intellect are incessantly pouring their influence one upon the other。 A tribunal there is for each one of us； whose voice is our conscience； but let us have done with these generalities about nations。 For the people that seems to be most sick the cure may be at hand； and one that appears to be healthy may bear within it the ripening germs of death； which the hour of danger will bring forth from their hiding…place。
Morality and Immorality
At the beginning of the sixteenth century； when the civilization of the Renaissance had reached its highest pitch； and at the same time the political ruin of the nation seemed inevitable； there were not wanting serious thinkers who saw a connexion between this ruin and the prevalent immorality。 It was not one 。of those methodistical moralists who in every age think themselves called to declaim against the wickedness of the time； but it was Machiavelli； who； in one of his best…considered works； said openly： 'We Italians are irreligious and corrupt above others。' Another man would perhaps have said； 'We are individually highly developed； we have outgrown the limits of morality and religion which were natural to us in our undeveloped state； and we despise outward law； because our rulers are illegitimate； and their judges and officers wicked men。' Machiavelli adds； 'because the Church and her representatives set us the worst example。'
Shall we add also； 'because the influence exercised by antiquity was in this respect unfavorable'？ The statement can only be received with many qualifications。 It may possibly be true of the humanists； especially as regards the profligacy of their lives。 Of the rest it may perhaps be said with some approach to accuracy that； after they became familiar with antiquity； they substituted for holinessthe Christian ideal of lifethe cult of historical greatness。 We can understand； therefore； how easily they would be tempted to consider those faults and vices to be matters of indifference； in spite of which their heroes were great。 They were probably scarcely conscious of this themselves； for if we are summoned to quote any statement of doctrine on this subject； we are again forced to appeal to humanists like Paolo Giovio； who excuses the perjury of Giangaleazzo Visconti； through which he was enabled to found an empire； by the example of Julius Caesar。 The great Florentine historians and statesmen never stoop to these slavish quotations； and what seems antique in their deeds and their judgements is so because the nature of their political life necessarily fostered in them a mode of thought which has some analogy with that of antiquity。
Nevertheless； it cannot be denied that Italy at the beginning of the sixteenth century found itself in the midst of a grave moral crisis； out of which the best men saw hardly any escape。
Let us begin by saying a few words about that moral force which was then the strongest bulwark against evil。 The highly gifted man of that day thought to find it in the sentiment of honour。 This is that enigmatic mixture of conscience and egotism which often survives in the modern man after he has lost； whether by his own fault or not； faith； love； and hope。 This sense of honour is compatible with much selfishness and great vices； and may be the victim of astonishing illusions； yet； nevertheless； all the noble elements that are left in the wreck of a character may gather around it； and from this fountain may draw new strength。 It has become； in a far wider sense than is commonly believed； a decisive test of conduct in the minds of the cultivated Europeans of our own day； and many of those who yet hold faithfully by religion and morality are unconsciously guided by this feeling in the gravest decisions of their lives。
It lies without the limits of our task to show how the men of antiquity also experienced this feeling in a peculiar form； and how； afterwards； in the Middle Ages； a special sense of honour became the mark of a particular class。 Nor can we here dispute with those who hold that conscience； rather than honour； is the motive power。 It would indeed be better and nobler if it were so； but since it must be granted that even our worthier resolutions result from 'a conscience more or less dimmed by selfishness；' it is better to call the mixture by its right name。 It is certainly not always easy； in treating of the Italian of this period； to distinguish this sense of honour from the passion for fame； into which； indeed； it easily passes。 Yet the two sentiments are essentially different。
There is no lack of witnesses on this subject。 One who speaks plainly may here be quoted as a representative of the rest。 We read in the recently published 'Aphorisms' of Guicciardini： 'who esteems honour highly succeeds in all that he undertakes； since he fears neither trouble； danger； nor expense； I have found it so in my own case； and may say it and write it； vain and dead are the deeds of men which have not this as their motive。' It is necessary to add that； from what is known of the life of the writer； he can here be only speaking of honour and not of fame。 Rabelais has put the matter more clearly than perhaps any Italian。 We quote him； indeed； unwillingly in these pages。 What the great； baroque Frenchman gives us is a picture of what the Renaissance would be without form and without beauty。 But his description of an ideal state of things in the Thelemite monastery is decisive as historical evidence。 In speaking of his gentlemen and ladies of the Order of Free Will； he tells us as follows：
'En leur reigle n'estoit que ceste clause： Fay ce que vouldras。 Parce que gens liberes； bien nayz； bien instruictz； conve