友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
热门书库 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

the civilization of the renaissance in italy-第22章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



rs embezzled the contributions sent for this  purpose from all parts of Christendom; and degraded the indulgences  granted in return for them into a private commercial speculation。  Innocent VIII consented to be gaoler to the fugitive Prince Djem; for a  salary paid by the prisoner's brother Bajazet II; and Alexander VI  supported the steps taken by Lodovico il Moro in Constantinople to  further a Turkish assault upon Venice (1498); whereupon the latter  threatened him with a Council。 It is clear that the notorious alliance  between Francis I and Soliman II was nothing new or unheard of。

Indeed; we find instances of whole populations to whom it seemed no  particular crime to go over bodily to the Turks。 Even if it were held  out as a threat to oppressive governments; this is at least a proof  that the idea had become familiar。 As early as 1480 Battista Mantovano  gives us clearly to understand that most of the inhabitants of the  Adriatic coast foresaw something o f this kind; and that Ancona in  particular desired it。 When Romagna was suffering from the oppressive  government of Leo X; a deputy from Ravenna said openly to the Legate;  Cardinal Giulio Medici: 'Monsignore; the honorable Republic of Venice  will not have us; for fear of a dispute with the Holy See; but if the  Turk comes to Ragusa we will put ourselves into his hands。'

It was a poor but not wholly groundless consolation for the enslavement  of Italy then begun by the Spaniards; that the country was at least  secured from the relapse into barbarism which would have awaited it  under the Turkish rule。 By itself; divided as it was; it could hardly  have escaped this fate。

If; with all these drawbacks; the Italian statesmanship of this period  deserves our praise; it is only on the ground of its practical and  unprejudiced treatment of those questions which were not affected by  fear; passion; or malice。 Here was no feudal system after the northern  fashion; with its artificial scheme of rights; but the power which each  possessed he held in practice as in theory。 Here was no attendant  nobility to foster in the mind of the prince the mediaeval sense of  honour with all its strange consequences; but princes and counsellors  were agreed in acting according to the exigencies of the particular  case and to the end they had in view。 Towards the men whose services  were used and towards allies; come from what quarter they might; no  pride of caste was felt which could possibly estrange a supporter; and  the class of the Condottieri; in which birth was a matter of  indifference; shows clearly enough in what sort of hands the real power  lay; and lastly; the government; in the hands of an enlightened despot;  had an incomparably more accurate acquaintance with its own country and  with that of its neighbors than was possessed by northern  contemporaries; and estimated the economical and moral capacities of  friend and foe down to the smallest particular。 The rulers were;  notwithstanding grave errors; born masters of statistical science。 With  such men negotiation was possible; it might be presumed that they would  be convinced and their opinion modified when practical reasons were  laid before them。 When the great Alfonso of Naples was (1434) a  prisoner of Filippo Maria Visconti; he was able to satisfy his gaoler  that the rule of the House of Anjou instead of his own at Naples would  make the French masters of Italy; Filippo Maria set him free without  ransom and made an alliance with him。 A northern prince would scarcely  have acted in the same way; certainly not one whose morality in other  respects was like that of Visconti。 What confidence was felt in the  power of self…interest is shown by the celebrated visit (1478) which  Lorenzo Magnifico; to the universal astonishment of the Florentines;  paid the faithless Ferrante at Naplesa man who would certainly be  tempted to keep him a prisoner; and was by no means too scrupulous to  do so。 For to arrest a powerful monarch; and then to let him go alive;  after extorting his signature and otherwise insulting him; as Charles  the Bold did to Louis XI at Peronne (1468); seemed madness to the  Italians; so that Lorenzo was expected to come back covered with glory;  or else not to come back at all。 The art of political persuasion was at  this time raised to a pointespecially by the Venetian ambassadors of  which northern nations first obtained a conception from the Italians;  and of which the official addresses give a most imperfect idea。 These  are mere pieces of humanistic rhetoric。 Nor; in spite of an otherwise  ceremonious etiquette was there in case of need any lack of rough and  frank speaking in diplomatic intercourse。 A man like Machiavelli  appears in his 'Legazioni' in an almost pathetic light。 Furnished with  scanty instructions; shabbily equipped; and treated as an agent of  inferior rank; he never loses his gift of free and wide observation or  his pleasure in picturesque description。

A special division of this work will treat of the study of man  individually and nationally; which among the Italians went hand in hand  with the study of the outward conditions of human life。

War as a Work of Art

It must here be briefly indicated by what steps the art of war assumed  the character of a product of reflection。 Throughout the countries of  the West the education of the individual soldier in the Middle Ages was  perfect within the limits of the then prevalent system of defence and  attack: nor was there any want of ingenious inventors in the arts of  besieging and of fortification。 But the development both of strategy  and of tactics was hindered by the character and duration of military  service; and by the ambition of the nobles; who disputed questions of  precedence in the face of the enemy; and through simple want of  discipline caused the loss of great battles like Crecy and Maupertuis。  Italy; on the contrary; was the first country to adopt the system of  mercenary troops; which demanded a wholly different organization; and  the early intro… duction of firearms did its part in making war a  democratic pursuit; not only because the strongest castles were unable  to withstand a bombardment; but because the skill of the engineer; of  the gunfounder; and of the artillerist men belonging to another class  than the nobilitywas now of the first importance in a campaign。 It  was felt; with regret; that the value of the individual; which had been  the soul of the small and admirably organized bands of mercenaries;  would suffer from these novel means of destruction; which did their  work at a distance; and there were Condottieri who opposed to the  utmost the introduction at least of the musket; which had lately been  invented in Germany。 We read that Paolo Vitelli; while recognizing and  himself adopting the cannon; put out the eyes and cut off the hands of  the captured 'schioppettieri' (arquebusiers) because he held it  unworthy that a gallant; and it might be noble; knight should be  wounded and laid low by a common; despised foot soldier。 On the whole;  however; the new discoveries were accepted and turned to useful  account; till the Italians became the teachers of all Europe; both in  the build… ing o
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!