友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
热门书库 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

meno-第10章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





clearly there can be no other teachers?



  Men。 No。



  Soc。 And if there are no teachers; neither are there disciples?



  Men。 Agreed。



  Soc。 And we have admitted that a thing cannot be taught of which



there are neither teachers nor disciples?



  Men。 We have。



  Soc。 And there are no teachers of virtue to be found anywhere?



  Men。 There are not。



  Soc。 And if there are no teachers; neither are there scholars?



  Men。 That; I think; is true。



  Soc。 Then virtue cannot be taught?



  Men。 Not if we are right in our view。 But I cannot believe;



Socrates; that there are no good men: And if there are; how did they



come into existence?



  Soc。 I am afraid; Meno; that you and I are not good for much; and



that Gorgias has been as poor an educator of you as Prodicus has



been of me。 Certainly we shall have to look to ourselves; and try to



find some one who will help in some way or other to improve us。 This I



say; because I observe that in the previous discussion none of us



remarked that right and good action is possible to man under other



guidance than that of knowledge (episteme);…and indeed if this be



denied; there is no seeing how there can be any good men at all。



  Men。 How do you mean; Socrates?



  Soc。 I mean that good men are necessarily useful or profitable。 Were



we not right in admitting this? It must be so。



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 And in supposing that they will be useful only if they are true



guides to us of action…there we were also right?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 But when we said that a man cannot be a good guide unless he



have knowledge (phrhonesis); this we were wrong。



  Men。 What do you mean by the word 〃right〃?



  Soc。 I will explain。 If a man knew the way to Larisa; or anywhere



else; and went to the place and led others thither; would he not be



a right and good guide?



  Men。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And a person who had a right opinion about the way; but had



never been and did not know; might be a good guide also; might he not?



  Men。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And while he has true opinion about that which the other knows;



he will be just as good a guide if he thinks the truth; as he who



knows the truth?



  Men。 Exactly。



  Soc。 Then true opinion is as good a guide to correct action as



knowledge; and that was the point which we omitted in our



speculation about the nature of virtue; when we said that knowledge



only is the guide of right action; whereas there is also right



opinion。



  Men。 True。



  Soc。 Then right opinion is not less useful than knowledge?



  Men。 The difference; Socrates; is only that he who has knowledge



will always be right; but he who has right opinion will sometimes be



right; and sometimes not。



  Soc。 What do you mean? Can he be wrong who has right opinion; so



long as he has right opinion?



  Men。 I admit the cogency of your argument; and therefore;



Socrates; I wonder that knowledge should be preferred to right



opinion…or why they should ever differ。



  Soc。 And shall I explain this wonder to you?



  Men。 Do tell me。



  Soc。 You would not wonder if you had ever observed the images of



Daedalus; but perhaps you have not got them in your country?



  Men。 What have they to do with the question?



  Soc。 Because they require to be fastened in order to keep them;



and if they are not fastened they will play truant and run away。



  Men。 Well。 what of that?



  Soc。 I mean to say that they are not very valuable possessions if



they are at liberty; for they will walk off like runaway slaves; but



when fastened; they are of great value; for they are really



beautiful works of art。 Now this is an illustration of the nature of



true opinions: while they abide with us they are beautiful and



fruitful; but they run away out of the human soul; and do not remain



long; and therefore they are not of much value until they are fastened



by the tie of the cause; and this fastening of them; friend Meno; is



recollection; as you and I have agreed to call it。 But when they are



bound; in the first place; they have the nature of knowledge; and;



in the second place; they are abiding。 And this is why knowledge is



more honourable and excellent than true opinion; because fastened by a



chain。



  Men。 What you are saying; Socrates; seems to be very like the truth。



  Soc。 I too speak rather in ignorance; I only conjecture。 And yet



that knowledge differs from true opinion is no matter of conjecture



with me。 There are not many things which I profess to know; but this



is most certainly one of them。



  Men。 Yes; Socrates; and you are quite right in saying so。



  Soc。 And am I not also right in saying that true opinion leading the



way perfects action quite as well as knowledge?



  Men。 There again; Socrates; I think you are right。



  Soc。 Then right opinion is not a whit inferior to knowledge; or less



useful in action; nor is the man who has right opinion inferior to him



who has knowledge?



  Men。 True。



  Soc。 And surely the good man has been acknowledged by us to be



useful?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 Seeing then that men become good and useful to states; not only



because they have knowledge; but because they have right opinion;



and that neither knowledge nor right opinion is given to man by nature



or acquired by him…(do you imagine either of them to be given by



nature?



  Men。 Not I。)



  Soc。 Then if they are not given by nature; neither are the good by



nature good?



  Men。 Certainly not。



  Soc。 And nature being excluded; then came the question whether



virtue is acquired by teaching?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 If virtue was wisdom 'or knowledge'; then; as we thought; it



was taught?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 And if it was taught it was wisdom?



  Men。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And if there were teachers; it might be taught; and if there



were no teachers; not?



  Men。 True。



  Soc。 But surely we acknowledged that there were no teachers of



virtue?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 Then we acknowledged that it was not taught; and was not



wisdom?



  Men。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And yet we admitted that it was a good?



  Men。 Yes。



  Soc。 And the right guide is useful and good?



  Men。 Certainly。



  Soc。 And the only right guides are knowledge and true



opinion…these are the guides of man; for things which happen by chance



are not under the guidance of man: but the guides of man are true



opinion and knowledge。



  Men。 I think so too。



  Soc。 But if virtue is not taught; neither is virtue knowledge。



  Men。 Clearly not。



  Soc。 Then of two good and useful things; one; which is knowledge;



has been set aside; and cannot be supposed to be our guide in



political life。



  Men。 I think not。



  Soc。 And therefore not by any wisdom; and not because they were



wise; did Themistocles and those others of whom Any
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!